The Week In Reviews!
Day 1: Pride & Prejudice
That's right, kids. I spent some time with Jane Austen this Saturday. No, I didn't spend money to see Keira Knightley sloppily kiss her Mr. Darcy (I don't care if Judi Dench kicks ass in another 5 minute cameo. After Domino, Keira owes me nude pictures of Orlando Bloom!). I went back to my old high school and saw a real-live teenage production. The results were, predictably, mixed. Some kids have it, some kids don't, and some just lack the ability to gauge when they're "screaming" as opposed to "projecting" in a black box production where the sound reverberates and stings your ears. Such are the problems with high school productions. For kids, by kids. As they say, "This ain't Shakespeare." Even when it is, it usually sucks.
Now, my alma mater does have an above-average drama program. This time around it wasn't to be, but usually the productions are quite good. But the performances weren't the problem this night. It was the subject matter. I can't stand stories where women are defined by their choice in men. While Pride is ultimately not that, there is enough to it (especially in the first act) to make me mad.
For those among us who are Austen challenged, this key might help. Bridget Jones' Diary is loosely a modern spin on the story. The character of Elizabeth is Bridget Jones. Mr. Darcy is Colin Firth (autuer Helen Fielding liked his performance in a BBC production of P&P so much that his last name is Darcy in Jones as well) and Hugh Grant is the buffonish
The point is that the director of the drama program is very staunchly feminist. I can get behind that, but I realized that she's fond of stories that are heavy of female leads (men are more of a plot device in this piece than anything else), yet they do nothing to edify women. "The girl is incomplete without a boy" message is the reason I hate Winona Ryder movies. Not that I'm an expert or anything, but if there aren't good roles out there, I'd start going with broad comedies and brooding dramas.
Granted, Pride & Prejudice is set during a time when women couldn't own property. It's not Jane Austen's fault there. But I think you get my point: When life makes you choose between the foppish cute guy whoe won't grow up or a man who's handsome smart and combative, choose Colin Firth. If you doubt me, watch Love, Actually.
-J.
This post was sponsored by the Clueless was a better Austen update than Bridget Jones! Committee.
4 comments:
NIce review,Jay-actually Hugh Grant's character is more Mr. Wickam than Mr. Collins but you're pretty on spot there.
I find feminist revisions most annoying-you can make a better point by just letting the story tell itself but then,people might actually think for themselves! The horror!:)
P&P,for example,shows that due to the property laws(and the lack of financial planning),if the Bennet girls didn't marry someone stable,they would wind up living in Poverty Row. Elizabeth wanted more than comfort,she really wanted to marry for love(a new notion). Elizabeth makes mistakes but she does not suffer fools gladly-girl kicks ass,verbally. Now THAT is enpowerment in my book.
I have never gotten through a Jane Austen novel, I have tried, but I end up bored out of my mind. I am an uncultured ass.
I do love the review though, and that is so fun that you went back to see a high school play at your alma mater. I went back to see a show at mine a few months ago.
I am wondering if P&P the movie is going to be good, even though I couldn't get into the book I am really wanting to see this movie.
I agree that we need to see a nude Orlando soon!
T. - Thanks! I've updated to reflect the Collins/Wickham confusion. I knew you'd be a great help.
Chip - The Princess saw the new P&P and said that there were too many Americans in the cast and that Judi Dench steals the show (no surprise there).
Eh, never liked Jane Austen much either. Maybe it's because I am unable to get over how she spelled her last name.
Post a Comment